decorative image

None of the Above

by Marble

Forcrying out loud we have debate about solid scientific models in this country, how can those percieving bias on the other side be considered in any way legitimate? I agree with Machiavelli, perception is reality. But that is only in politics because politics is artifice. It aims at misrepresenting the world. If you take that as the basis of your reality, then of course there is no objective perspective. What then is the point of communication? Solely bending others to your will?
-Smedleyman, at metafilter

« Spyware vexes me:
Main
This is why I love quonsar: »
[ sick and wrong ] 2004-08-03
Inspections? No way: I am intrigued to hear that the US now opposes inspections and verification in a treaty that is designed to ban production of highly enriched uranium and plutonium for nuclear weapons.

I mean, how boneheaded can you get? What can I really say about this, except blah blah double standard blah blah idiotic etc etc.

Administration officials declined to explain in detail how they believed U.S. security would be harmed by creating a plan to monitor the treaty.

Arms-control specialists reacted negatively, saying the change in U.S. position will dramatically weaken any treaty and make it harder to prevent nuclear materials from falling into the hands of terrorists.

Email this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):


administrative interface